World's Leading Sponsor Of Terrorism!

47 +

World's Leading Sponsor Of Terrorism!..............
Jahangir Khoshrou

You probably hear the word "IRAN", in every sentence that is spoken by the US politicians when they make reference to "TERRORISM". In fact, as far as they are concerned, the Iranians have been involved in the act of terrorism since the Jurrasic period! (someone warn Lucy the Australopithecus afarensis !).

It has always amazed me that how ignominious the American populace are when it comes to foreign affairs and the conduct of their elected politicians in the same respect. therefore, I thought I might throw some light on this subject, not to enlighten the fast food loving, over-sized US citizens but to get it out of my system and into the open!. In other words, I am going to wash the US elite's dirty laundry in the public!.

THE HISTORY AS IT HAPPENS.........

During the 1970′s the CIA used the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as a barrier, both to thwart Soviet expansion and prevent the spread of Marxist ideology among the Arab masses. The United States also openly supported Sarekat Islam against Sukarno in Indonesia and supported the Jamaat-e-Islami terror group against Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in Pakistan. Last but certainly not least, there is Al Qaeda.

Lest we forget, the CIA gave birth to Osama Bin Laden and breastfed his organisation during the 1980s. Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, told the House of Commons that Al Qaeda was unquestionably a product of Western intelligence agencies. Mr. Cook explained that Al Qaeda, which literally means an abbreviation of “the database” in Arabic, was originally the computer database of the thousands of Islamist extremists, who were trained by the CIA and funded by the Saudis, in order to defeat the Russians in Afghanistan.

America’s relationship with Al Qaeda has always been a love-hate affair. Depending on whether a particular Al Qaeda terrorist group in a given region furthers American interests or not, the U.S. State Department either funds or aggressively targets that terrorist group. Even as American foreign policy makers claim to oppose Muslim extremism, they knowingly foment it as a weapon of foreign policy.

The Islamic State is its latest weapon that, much like Al Qaeda, is certainly backfiring. ISIS recently rose to international prominence after its thugs began beheading American journalists. Now the terrorist group controls an area the size of the United Kingdom.

In order to understand why the Islamic State has grown and flourished so quickly, one has to take a look at the organisation's American-backed roots. The 2003 American invasion and occupation of Iraq created the pre-conditions for radical Sunni groups, like ISIS, to take root. America, rather unwisely, destroyed Saddam Hussein’s secular state machinery and replaced it with a predominantly Shiite administration. The U.S. occupation caused vast unemployment in Sunni areas, by rejecting socialism and closing down factories in the naive hope that the magical hand of the free market would create jobs. Under the new U.S.-backed Shiite regime, working class Sunnis lost hundreds of thousands of jobs. Unlike the white Afrikaners in South Africa, who were allowed to keep their wealth after regime change, upper-class Sunnis were systematically dispossessed of their assets and lost their political influence. Rather than promoting religious integration and unity, American policy in Iraq exacerbated sectarian divisions and created a fertile breading ground for Sunni discontent, from which Al Qaeda in Iraq took root.

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) used to have a different name: Al Qaeda in Iraq. After 2010 the group re branded and refocused its efforts on Syria.

There are essentially three wars being waged in Syria: one between the government and the rebels, another between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and yet another between America and Russia. It is this third, neo-Cold War battle that made U.S. foreign policy makers decide to take the risk of arming Islamist rebels in Syria, because Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, is a key Russian ally. Rather embarrassingly, many of these Syrian rebels have now turned out to be ISIS thugs, who are openly brandishing American-made M16 Assault rifles.

America’s Middle East policy revolves around oil and Israel. The invasion of Iraq has partially satisfied Washington’s thirst for oil, but ongoing air strikes in Syria and economic sanctions on Iran have everything to do with Israel. The goal is to deprive Israel’s neighbouring enemies, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Palestine’s Hamas, of crucial Syrian and Iranian support.

ISIS is not merely an instrument of terror used by America to topple the Syrian government; it is also used to put pressure on Iran.

The last time Iran invaded another nation was in 1738. Since independence in 1776, the U.S. has been engaged in over 53 military invasions and expeditions. Despite what the Western media’s war cries would have you believe, Iran is clearly not the threat to regional security, Washington is. An Intelligence Report published in 2012, endorsed by all sixteen U.S. intelligence agencies, confirms that Iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Truth is, any Iranian nuclear ambition, real or imagined, is as a result of American hostility towards Iran, and not the other way around.

America is using ISIS in three ways: to attack its enemies in the Middle East, to serve as a pretext for U.S. military intervention abroad, and at home to foment a manufactured domestic threat, used to justify the unprecedented expansion of invasive domestic surveillance.

By rapidly increasing both government secrecy and surveillance, Mr. Obama’s government is increasing its power to watch its citizens, while diminishing its citizens’ power to watch their government. Terrorism is an excuse to justify mass surveillance, in preparation for mass revolt.

The so-called “War on Terror” should be seen for what it really is: a pretext for maintaining a dangerously oversized U.S. military. The two most powerful groups in the U.S. foreign policy establishment are the Israel lobby, which directs U.S. Middle East policy, and the Military-Industrial-Complex, which profits from the former group’s actions. Since George W. Bush declared the “War on Terror” in October 2001, it has cost the American taxpayer approximately 6.6 trillion dollars and thousands of fallen sons and daughters; but, the wars have also raked in billions of dollars for Washington’s military elite.

In fact, more than seventy American companies and individuals have won up to $27 billion in contracts for work in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan over the last three years, according to a recent study by the Center for Public Integrity. According to the study, nearly 75 per cent of these private companies had employees or board members, who either served in, or had close ties to, the executive branch of the Republican and Democratic administrations, members of Congress, or the highest levels of the military.

In 1997, a U.S. Department of Defence report stated, “the data show a strong correlation between U.S. involvement abroad and an increase in terrorist attacks against the U.S.” Truth is, the only way America can win the “War On Terror” is if it stops giving terrorists the motivation and the resources to attack America. Terrorism is the symptom; American imperialism in the Middle East is the cancer. Put simply, the War on Terror is terrorism; only, it is conducted on a much larger scale by people with jets and missiles.

MY CASE STUDY IN INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM........

Invasion Of Iraq.

Wikileaks has released the July 25, 1990 cable by US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie in which she reported her meeting with Saddam Hussein over the Kuwait crisis (Saddam had summoned her). Her infamous reference to the US not getting involved in inter-Arab disputes , the exact border between Iraq and Kuwait, was interpreted by Saddam as US green light to invade Kuwait ( as indeed it was!).
Following invasion of Kuwait by Saddam's military, and fleeing of Kuwaiti ruler Jaber al-Ahmad al-Sabah to the bosom of the Saudi Arabia, United States and United Kingdom started assembly of coalition of the willing to liberate Kuwait (does that sound familiar?), in doing so the UK foreign secretary Douglas Hurd, took a tour of the European and Asian countries to collect funds for the operation Desert Storm(The baking of the pie), and in return for their financial contribution they were promised large contracts in Kuwait after its liberation (Dividing the pie). Douglas Hurd met self-exiled Kuwaiti ruler Jaber al-Ahmad al-Sabah in Saudi Arabia and received his consent to the cost that the Kuwait had to pay to get his throne back. The rest is history!.

Conclusion...........

The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan, General William Odom recently remarked, “by any measure the U.S. has long used terrorism. In 1978-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the U.S. would be in violation.”
so you heard it from the Horse's mouth!. I rest my case!......



Boosters

Members who have given this post a Boost with their Coins

5 comments

Best   /  Newest   /  Oldest
Siavash Siavash (@Siavash) Pinned comment
I almost forgot to say about assassination of Iran's scientists. The sister of scientist said that criminal mullahs killed her brother because he was not willing to obey mullahs order of making the bomb.
Here is the full report.


the sister of Dr. Hosseinpour has come forward–some seven years later–telling The Media Line a very different story from the commonly-held narrative. She claimed in the Skype interview that it was Iran’s own Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) that killed her brother; largely because of his refusal to help weaponize the Ayatollah’s nuclear program.

Mahboobeh Hosseinpour continued, talking about how she learned through her sister in law about her brother’s research into nuclear research. She said that he had been tasked with helping to create a bomb that would have twelve times the power of the Hiroshima atomic bomb dropped on Japan at the end of World War II.

“He was offered a two star rank in the Revolutionary Guard” if he agreed to join the nuclear program, she said. Mahmoobeh Hosseinpour also mentioned that the Ayatollah Khamenei had attached a personal message to try and sway Dr. Hosseinpour towards joining the effort. When he refused, he was killed by the guard, she alleged.

Source:


www.breitbart.com/national-security/2014/09/30/sister-iran-killed-nuclear-scientist-for-refusing-to-develop-nuke-12-times-stronger-than-hiroshima/
See More
0 +
 
ChamoshChamoshvnd ChamoshChamoshvnd (@ChamoshChamoshvnd) replied to Siavash (@Siavash) Pinned comment
You also forgot to mention how monarchy was the incubator of Islamic Republic of Hell.
See More
0 +
 
Siavash Siavash (@Siavash) Pinned comment
Ruling criminal mullahs in Iran are number one terrorist in the world.
No one can substitute any other organization instead of criminal mullahs. Nice try though.
Here is highlight of Mullahs' sponsoring terrorism around the world since they took power in Iran.
1. Taking defenseless american hostages in captivity for 444 days in 1979.
2. Bomb explosion in Beirut, Lebanon in Oct. 1983.
3. Installing mines in Persian Gulf in 1987 which led to explosion of some U.S ships. Some of those bomb installers had been captured by U.S navy forces. Funny part was all those bomb installers applied for political asylum from U.S when they were captured.
4. The assassination of Kurdish teams and it's leader Dr. Sharafkandi in Mykonos restaurant in Germany.
5. Assassination of Dr. Bakhtaiar and his top Aid in his resident in Paris, France.
6. Assassination of Farokhzad in his resident in Germany.
7. Blowing Jewish cultural center in Argentine (1994) which led to murder of 88 Jewish people. Falaheiyan , the head of Mullahs ministry of information at the time, and Rafsanjani's names are still in the list of international crime court (I.C.C).
8. Chain of murder in late 1990's which led to killing many of Iranian intellectuals and writers such as Mohammad Mokhtari... jafar Poyandeh.... while Rafsanjani was president. He masterminded all the killings.
9. Left and right slow killing of many of defenseless students, who were opposed to criminal mullahs, by poising them in prisons.
10. causing social turmoil in Bahrain by provoking Shia against Sunni government in that country.
11. Sending thugs to Mecca which caused the dead of over 400 pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia during Haj ceremony.
12. sending thugs to Yemen to provoke Hotti shia minority against Sunni majority in that country.
13. Sending Iranian money to terrorist groups of Hezbollah, Hamas, Jihad eslami... etc... in Lebanon.
14. installing roadside bomb to blowing up U.S army tanks during Iraq's liberation.
15. financial, military support the Medi's army, Hassan Nasrollah... in Iraq.
16. bomb explosion at Israel's embassy in India and Georgia in 2012.
17.....
.....
See More
0 +
 
ChamoshChamoshvnd ChamoshChamoshvnd (@ChamoshChamoshvnd) replied to Siavash (@Siavash) Pinned comment
What you and author of this blog have in common is your shared amnesia about how political Islam in Iran was mainly a creation of Cold War politics and Western intervention in Iran's internal affairs.
Monarchists always forget how Kashani and other reactionary mullahs were instrumental in 1953 Coup, and how they sponsored and augmented ultraconservative Shia groups like Hojatieh.
Hezbollahis also suffer from the exact same amnesia since admitting that monarchy let them loose on Iranian people would be a self admission as to why political Islam is Iran is totally an illegitimate entity.
As far as substance and their real nature is concerned Hezbollahis and Shahollahis are birds of the same feather; hence why they're both so despised and detested by Iranians.
See More
0 +
 
ChamoshChamoshvnd ChamoshChamoshvnd (@ChamoshChamoshvnd) Pinned comment
Jahangir khan thanks for your contribution in exposing the hypocrisy of US establishment in its promotion of Political Islam in our region, but it seems you might have forgotten a minor detail: how US cold war policies in Iran led to suppression and elimination of all nationalist and leftists currents while it augmented the conservative Shia clergy (SAVAK's sponsorship of Hojatieh, promotion of Hossanieh Ershaad,..).
Then again many of our intellectuals have a long standing tendency to be in solidarity with all peoples of the world, but somehow they always forget the people of Iran!
See More
0 +
 
More