Boosters

Members who have given this post a Boost with their Coins

32 comments

Best   /  Newest   /  Oldest
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
It is about time that women under islam have the protection of secular law, religious law does nothing to protect them, they have second class status under islamic law, as do other people who have other beliefs other than islam
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Abol khan, secular laws are for sure much more advanced and humanitarian than religious laws, but laws in and of themselves don't mean much. India is the largest democracy in the world, with secular laws governing its courts and it has the most outrageous record on Women's Rights in the world. Recently in India unspeakable attacks and crimes against women have caused a mass protest movement.
Closer to home under own shahanshah all Iranian women were protected by secular-civil Laws, unless they disagreed and protested against him, then they were sent to Evin or worse.
Last and not least, it would nice of "Telesurtv" to do a series on Women and Hunger in Venezuela.
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
Yes and in Iran today, they are sent to evin prison and raped before they are executed, we have made such great progress in islamic republic of hell
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Yes Abol khan, the biggest 'progress' we made was when low life monarchists and filthy mullahs like Kashani got together and destroyed all our democratic institutions, in Aug of 1953. All this slippery slope starts from there. But don't mention it to either low life monarchists or filthy mullahs, they just don't wanna hear any of it;
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
well all mullahs are filthy, your accusations of monarchists destroying democratic institutions may be valid, but today in Islamic republic of hell, women are especially abused and rape of women before they are hanged is looked as a religious obligation by the criminals who practice islam. There will never be progress for half the population of Iran under this religion of islam, since islam is a religion that sees women nothing more then personal property and used only to satisfy the carnal needs of the males. Even in death women are relegated to sex slaves to satisfy the sexual needs of the so called martyrs upto 72 or so they say.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
No and no!
Not all mullahs are filthy, right now in Iranian jails there are a good number of mullahs who are opposed to the regime and paying the price for their principled opposition.
Shah's destruction of Iranian democracy is not an 'accusation.' Shah's systematic destruction of our democracy is a historical fact which is amply documented. If you refuse to study history and comprehend these facts that is only an indication of limitations on your part. Practically ALL our current problems dates back to that infamy in August of 1953. But for individuals like you it is still 'maybe.' Which is a damn shame.
By the same token that all mullahs are not filthy reactionaries (although majority of them are in that category) not all monarchists are low lifes either; for instance we have historical figures like general Fereydoun Djam, who was a professional to the core, and very independent minded, which at the end cost him his job as the chief commander of Iranian army.
Your take on Islam also smacks of and highly bears resemblance to Trump's Islamophobia. All organized religions are corrupt, male-chauvinist and primitive, but you keep picking only on Islam.
This kind of extremely one-sided, simplified mode of 'analysis' is actually worse kind of non-thinking and also another source of our problems.

See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
My take on islam is through reading of the origin of islam by the liar mohammad, in his day he could lie that allah is a guy sitting on a throne up in the sky communicating with him, and people would have believed him, but if that same child rapist came today he would be put away in a jail for child rape and murder.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
There you go again with your one-sided take on Islam.
Catholic church is practically going financially bankrupt (for the most part they were always morally bankrupt) because of all these cases of child abuse and legal actions taken against the Church.
Go and read about all those cases of sexual abuse of children by Hasidic rabbis,...
But in your little Islamophobic world everyone is an Angel except Muslims!
And you don't have a single word about the infamy of August 1953.
This one-sidedness is as pathetic and as ridiculous as it comes. Simply inexcusable.
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
You are so ignorant, I never said all moslems are evil, as I have said befor 99 percent are good decent people, but DO NOT confuse them with the so called Prophets, Jesus never said come on guys lets kill all the romans we can, on the contrary he died on the cross as a man of peace, Bahaullah never killed anyone, on the contrary he was killed by the instigation of the islamic clergy, where as the key figure here MOHAAMAD did kill, he had sex slaves he had all his captives turned into slaves and women as sex slaves unless they converted, he had the sexual hots and urges of a pedophile, so much so that he became infatuated with the 6 year old daughter of Abu Bakr, and lied to him that Allah has instructed him to marry her, so in fact he was also a child rapist as well. When his organization needed money again he lied and said Allah has instructed him that it is permissible to raid carravans for booty and kill people. All I am saying is that DO NOT confuse the truth about Mohaamad and the rest of the people like Jesus,Zarathustra, Budha, Bahaullah. Mohaamad is alone in this depravity, which ISIS is using as an example do commit the same crimes
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Abol khan, low life monarchists who still refuse to admit their role in the infamy of August 1953 are the most ignorant.
Islamophobia is also a most depraved form of racism that only a bunch of Gunga Dins subscribe to. All organized religions are corrupt, but your racism prevents you from acknowledging such a simple fact.
This one-sidedness is as pathetic and as ridiculous as it comes. Simply inexcusable.

See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
You can say what you want, but every thing I said about Mohammad is true, I have no argument about your statement as to Organized religion being corrupt, they are absolutely corrupt, because of the nature of human beings who are power and wealth hungry, none of the leaders of any of the organized religions have a monopoly on God. My argument is and has always been that Mohammad was far from a prophet of God, he was nothing more than an opportunist and a liar and just as corrupt as any of the worst of human beings dead or alive today. This one sidedness you accuse me of is also not honest, since I have not said anything negative about any other religions or Prophets, I may not believe in them either, but it is a question of live and let live, so my one sidedness as you accuse me of may be true about islam, it is corrupt and has always been corrupt, it was invented by an illiterate but brilliant liar who through his religion that he invented and lied about took control of the masses.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
All religions are bad but the only one you keep attacking (in a rather crude and pedestrian attempt) is Isam. We Iranians all have a heavy baggage with Islam, but whether we like or not Islam like any other civilization has had its glory days (Islam of Andalusia) and its not so glorious day (Islam of today). What is visibility discernable in your primitive 'argument' is an issue which in today's world is understood as Islamophobia. Made even more fashionable by Trump, white supremacist, and neo-Nazis.
Combining this Islamophobia with the continued childish silence on infamy of August 1953 in Iran we end up with that same old tired monarchist low life mentality, which is as pathetic and as ridiculous as it gets.
Simply inexcusable.
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
Yeah, Yeah Yeah, the issue again is the liar you believe in, the essence of its founder is lies, corruption, rape, murder. There is no God, Holy spirit that would have condoned anything Mohammad did, but you are so blind to it since the day you were born you were told about all the lies of his message from God, the facts remain the same, any one who did or would do today that mohammad did would be at best locked in prison for pedophilia , child rape and murder. But you seem to think nothing about his crimes, but bring ON THE LOW LIFE MONARCHISTS, Bullshit, you are absolutely besotted by the anti - monarch bull, if you had any Brains or intelligence and know your history and the universe we live in, you would throw your religion into the garbage can of history. Being an atheist is one leg up from islam, atleast an athiest has his eyes open and wont fall for the lies of your beliefs. An atheist is held higher I am sure in the eyes of God then people who believe that it is the duty of believers in islam to force conversion or face death and other penalties
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
A crude and pedestrian mind, such as a low life monarchist mind, can not fathom that one could be Agnostic or even an Atheists and at the same time oppose Islamophobia, which is the case here.
I've been an Atheist since early teen years. How about you?
If you really believe in the advantages of Atheism, then you ought to ponder how that scum of a 'king' in Iran from 1953 to 1979 was a thoroughly superstitious religious a..hole. And based upon this fact why monarchist low lifes that still idealize him are nothing but a bunch of a..holes as well.
You still suffer from Islamophobia.
Simply inexcusable.

See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
The King was a religious a...hole as you say, but the same religious scum got rid of him and imposed a satanic version of government on Iran, I dont suffer from islamophobia, it means and an unnatural fear of islam, so no I dont fear islam, I detest it and its founder who has brought to this world nothing but death and corruption.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Now you're taking your rudimentary steps towards spiritual liberation, by admitting that shah was a major league, colossal a..hole, and all his followers are also by definition colossal, major league a..holes, as well.
As a second step you need to comprehend how shah was the one who cultivated these snakes in his sleeve, as we say in Persian. So shah's worst enemy was his a..hole self and no one else. The question is not why shah was overthrown but rather how the heck in the world he lasted as much as he did.
As a third step towards acquiring a non-simplified mindset, you need to educate yourself and comprehend all the positive contributions of Islamic civilization to the world history.
All these absolutist, childish 'nothing but' statements are as pathetic and as ridiculous as I've seen. Simply inexcusable.
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
First of all you are not educating me about anything or any one, The Shah is history, islamic civilization is nothing more then Persian civilization, islam didnt provide anything to the world except death, it was the Persian civilization which was forced into subjugation by the islamic hordes and forcefully converted to islam, that contributed to the world. I bet right now that you live in a christian world, where you can mouth off what ever you like freely, in an islamic society your life especially, now that you have admitted to being an athiest wouldnt be worth warm spit.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Islamic civilization in its heydays was a World Civilization which incorporated Asian, African and European cultures. To the extent you deny this basic fact, you remain an unrepentant ignoramus.
And you are starting to admit just how much of an a..hole shah really was, so at least on that account you're education has just begun.
For rest of the nonsense you're still attached to, it all sounds just like the incoherent nonsense that welfare leech Palizy used to hallucinate.
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
the islamic civilization is an oximoron. Islam by definition of its very name is not civilized, never has been and never will be. The Shah was a million times better than what is there now or any other islamist and any mujahedin piece of garbage.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
No, incoherent, inconsistent, depraved, degenerate low life monarchists are the epitome of oxymoronic. One day they admit shah was a colossal, major league superstitious religious a..hole, and the ultimate reason mullahs came to power in Iran but next day they revert back to monarchist low life mentality and forget everything they wrote the day before.
So which one is it? If that scumbag of a 'king' was the enabler and facilitator of mullahs hegemony in Iran, how could he be any better than them?
Moslem rulers in Andalusia were tolerant of Jews and Christian and their multi-culturalism is still valid for 21st century, unless one happens to be a white supremacist or a low life monarchists.
Translation of classical Greek philosophical texts into Arabic was the main reason how these texts survived and ignited the Renaissance.
But unreconstructed ignoramus low life monarchists don't need to know any of this history, because they're debased, degenerate low life monarchists.



See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
I have never called the Shah of Iran a scum bag, I call all believers of islam scum, so dont confuse the two, the tolerance under islam is a fantasy, it may last a couple of decades under one ruler and end under another ruler. only in a christian society can low lifes be free and are tolerated in actual fact. Your islamic bent is so hypocritical since you have admitted to being an athiest, well kudos to you, you are one step above the satan worshiping scum of islam, but you life will be ended in islamic republic of hell. Again the translations of classical Greek philosphy were done by Persians and if it was left for the believers of islam that came from what is today Arabia, they would have all been burnt as your heroes calling themselves isis are doing today.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Here's what you wrote yesterday:
"The King was a religious a...hole as you say, but.."
Today you declare:
" I call all believers of islam scum,..."
Put the two together and see what you get.
Since shah was a believer, even by your own demented, insane 'standards' shah becomes a scumbag.
Only because you have access to a keyboard and can type whatever utter nonsense comes to your incoherent 'mind', doesn't mean you could rewrite and distort history. You're still, at least historically, an ignoramus and proud of it. Which bears an uncanny resemblance to that welfare queen Palizy. Coincidence? Highly unlikely.
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
aboly, or is it really ChamoshChamoshvnd , or some other name of the same individual, you do not fool any one here by changing your name. The only thing about the Shah was that he was a coward when he left Iran, he should have had the courage to stay and fight for the Iranian values ( note not islamic moslem values ), instead he left town, and we have this islamic scum on earth in control of the country. You keep on talking about the welfare queen Palizy, the only queen here is you mr ChamoshChamoshvnd or aboly, so now you have double the worries, athiest as well as a queen, you are better off crawling under a rock, so you wont be found out by the soldiers of the islamic republic of hell.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Low life monarchist values are Theft, Criminality and Betrayal, as was shah's and and has been practiced by his followers.
Pallizy is a welfare queen, since he himself also admitted to being one.
Here's what you wrote yesterday:
"The King was a religious a...hole as you say, but.."
Today you declare:
" I call all believers of islam scum,..."
Put the two together and see what you get.
Since shah was a believer, even by your own demented, insane 'standards' shah becomes a scumbag.
But you still have faith in a scumbag coward as a leader (both characterizations based on your own words). Have you ever wondered what that makes you?

See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
Ok, ChamoshChamoshvnd or Aboly, take your islamic and your queen and athiestic values and ponder this question, why do you live in a Christian society amid Christian values, the answer is simple you are free here, free to think, free to believe in what ever you wish to believe and not to believe and YES even free to be a queen as you well put it, and not being killed for your beliefs or your sexuality.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Not OK.
First off, you still haven't fully acknowledged your pronunciation of shah as a coward and a scumbag, as he truly always was (maybe a bit less while he was younger, but definitely a total coward and scum as he got older). Of course all Iranians, except low life monarchists, fully knew all along that shah was an outstanding coward and a sleazy scumbag.
Let's recap, if you will, so there will be no miscommunications (Jürgen Habermas might call such as attempt at elimination of any miscommunication "an ideal speech situation" where there's no room for any distortions in communications,"Diskursethik").
Last night you admitted that:
"The only thing about the Shah was that he was a coward..."
'Coward' is the operative word here.
Earlier you had written that:
"The King was a religious a...hole as you say..." and since you also happen to 'think' that "all believers of islam scum" then your coward king , since he was a religious a..hole,as a result also becomes a scum.
The fact that you have reached these conclusions in a matter of couple of days, after a lifetime of defending and apologizing for this coward scum is in some sense an achievement (In Philosophy of Science such sudden shifts in knowledge and comprehension are called either: 'Paradigm Shifts', per Thomas S. Kuhn, or 'Epistemological Breaks', per Gaston Bachelard). This is almost enough to get off the list of low life monarchists, depending on future conduct.
And on this 64th anniversary of the August 1953 Infamy in Iran let's not forget how that coward scum 'king' with assistance from filthy mullahs like kashani, is responsible for our current predicament by how he single handedly destroyed all our democratic institutions and created the slippery slope that has brought us to the Islamic State in Iran of today.

BTW: Islamic State of Iran is always a better and more accurate description of IR, since all Hezbollahis themselves refer to the government in Iran as Islamic State and also the fact that this so called "Republic" is only a farce of an authentic Republic, and only another linguistic tool for mullahs to distort reality of their hellish rule.

Anywho, two more short points and out of here.
1) Being a Welfare Queen is very different from being a queen. The former refers to a lazy, undisciplined, unproductive leech who feeds off the toil of others for their livelihood. Very much like low life monarchists who used to live off the toil of Iranian people while they were in power and now, late if life, have to rely on her Queens stipends and live off the toil of English people (Did anyone say Palizy?).
But the latter is used in Homophobic discourse to demean and demonize folks with other tendencies.
2) Now we could safely add to your long and sorry list of Phobias (Afro-Black phobia, Arab phobia, Islamophobia) also Homophobia.
Congrats!
Out of curiosity, is there a psychosis you are not suffering from? Just asking.
After all maybe low life monarchist mentality could be permanent.


See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
Listen Queen, I am not going to argue with you about the Shah, I wish he was like his father and people like Khomeini would have been executed rather then exiled, now since you yourself have admitted your homo sexual tendencies, why dont you just go away, I make no judgements on your sexuality it is between you and your God, oh wait you also said you are an atheist.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
Listen Homophobe, Islamophobe, Arabophone, Blackphone,..is there a psychosis you are not suffering from?
Only in low life monarchist mentality if one opposes Islamophobia one has to be a Muslim, and it goes with the rest of your psychoses.
You still have to admit how you have officially and publicly admitted and acknowledged to the fact that shah was a coward scumbag.
Based on historical facts his father was even a bigger and worse coward and scumbag, but we'll educate you furthermore on that in the future.
For now your unambiguous admittance is the first step.
All these fears and insecurities about other people (such utter trepidation and dread about Muslims, Blacks, Arabs, Others,...) point out to a very problematic childhood (Did anyone say Palizy?).
See More
0 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
listen chamosh chamos or is it still aboly, what ever, you are the one obsessed with the word queen, I am not homophobic about your situation, you are what you are , GAY as hell, you have admitted it to it many times, you are the one who is obsessed by it, so let it go, you can come out of the closet, the western christian culture will not put you to death.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
No, you need to listen to other people about your situation and get some serious help about the arrays of psychoses you are suffering from, from Islamophobia to Arabophobia to Black Phobia to...
After getting the proper help to alleviate your insecurities and fears you ought to think about the problematic childhood that has caused you all such hatred and fear.
But above all you need to publicly and officially acknowledged how, even you of all the diehard monarchists, has finally admitted that shah was nothing but a cowards and a scumbag. A coward and scumbag that destroyed our lives, and you've wasted your entire life defending.
Looks like that problematic childhood well extends into adulthood (Did anyone say Palizy?).
See More
1 +
 
abolhussein abolhussein (@abolhussein) replied to Aboly (@Aboly) Pinned comment
Look come out of the closet, but right now at least use one handle not either aboly or chamoschamoshwnd, also you dont have to give yourself a thumbs up as you just did using chamoshchamoshwnd, believe me if you come out of the closet you will find that in a christian society you will not be killed, but then I am preaching to the deaf and blind, so keep on talking about the low life monarchists, you are nothing more then a low life yourself, you cant even admit that your gayness will not be tolerated in your islamic society, since you will always be apologetic about islam, but islam is your worst enemy, not because they worship God,they dont, if they did worship God, they wouldnt try to kill unforturnate individuals like you to get their reward of 72 women in heaven.
See More
0 +
 
Aboly Aboly (@Aboly) replied to abolhussein (@abolhussein) Pinned comment
The only closet here is the closeted wretched mind of low life monarchists packed with an assortment of fears, insecurities and hatred.
This type of an accumulation of psychoses in one person, simultaneously suffering from a combination of Islamophobia, Blackophobia, Homophobia, Arabophobia (and who knows what other types of craziness) is 'uniquely' singular.
It's also interesting how degenerate monarchists closely resemble their Hezbollahi cousins in all types of racism, phobias and hatred. Low life monarchists' expression of their pathology and degeneracies differ from Hezbollahis, but at the bottom they're both driven by a perpetual fear and hatred.
The particular reason why some monarchist low lifes (Did anyone say Palizy?) stand out is how, after all these years of defending a scumbag coward, they've all of a sudden confessed the truth.
Thus, unfortunate individuals are those psychotic low life monarchists with problematic childhoods (which to an extent is the reason for demented mindset) who have wasted their entire adult life defending a coward scumbag, just to discover in ripe old age what their 'king' was all along a coward scum.
The query remains: When low life monarchists defend a coward scum all their lives, are they also anything but cowards scums?
Most probably not.
See More
0 +
 
More